However, the above observation is without prejudice towards the legal rights of the parties, arising out in the over marriage of the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of regulation. Read more
Some pluralist systems, such as Scots regulation in Scotland and types of civil legislation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, never specifically in shape into the dual common-civil legislation system classifications. These types of systems may have been greatly influenced by the Anglo-American common legislation tradition; however, their substantive regulation is firmly rooted inside the civil legislation tradition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents of your boy or girl tend not to approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they're able to do if they could Minimize off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by regulation.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and also the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally recognized conviction. Read more
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not use, since the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, somewhat he is acquitted on the criminal charges based on evidence and it is well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this really charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment with the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all future purposes. The aforesaid proposition has long been set at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to these past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.
PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
For those who find an error during the content material of a published opinion (such as a misspelled name or possibly a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling to the same variety of case.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. In the event the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 days for the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided from the decision in the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is additionally a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty click here in the charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.